Delirium Bibliography

Delirium Bibliography books graphicWhat is the Delirium Bibliography? The searchable Delirium Bibliography page is one of our most popular features, allowing you to quickly gain access to the literature on delirium and acute care of older persons. It is primarily intended for clinicians and researchers interested in exploring these topics. The NIDUS team keeps it updated for you on a monthly basis!

How to Search for Articles: Search by author, title, year, and/or keywords. Each article is indexed by keywords taken from MEDLINE and other relevant databases. Click on the title of the article to read the abstract, journal, etc.

Reference Information

Title
Gabapentinoids-Related Delirium Adverse Events: A Real-World Study from 2004 to 2022 Based on FAERS
Authors
Nie, Z. Liang, C. Li, Z. Han, X. Zhang, R.
Year
2024
Journal
J Pain Res
Abstract

PURPOSE: This study comprehensively describes and evaluates the correlation between gabapentinoids and all types of delirium. METHODS: We used AERSMine to select all adverse reaction data from 2004 Q1 to the 2022 Q4 in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, and delirium events reported by gabapentinoids drugs were included in this study. Collected and analyzed the clinical details of these reports. We have developed four models. Among the four models, reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR) were used to evaluate the potential association between and delirium. We undertook a subgroup analysis for the age and sex cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 2950 reports of gabapentinoids-related delirium was collected. Excluding cases with a history of delirium (Model 2), opioid drugs (Model 3), and other adverse events related to gabapentinoids drugs (Model 4), pain cases with gabapentin drugs as the main suspected drug were selected. In model 1, the reporting rates of delirium at the delirium and delirium tremens levels were higher in the gabapentinoids group than in the non-gabapentinoids group (ROR 1.09(1.05,1.13); ROR 1.54(1.16,2.04)). In model 2.3 the delira and the delirium level were higher in the gabapentinoids group (ROR 1.42(1.29,1.56), ROR 1.44(1.31,1.59); ROR 1.43(1.30,1.58), ROR 1.46(1.33,1.61)). There is no difference in delirium levels in Model 4. Delirium levels were higher in the gabapentinoids group than in the non-gabapentinoids group in ≥65 years old. The delirium and deliria levels were higher in the male group than in the female group. CONCLUSION: The delirium adverse reactions of the gabapentinoids group were significantly higher than those of non-gabapentinoids group in the first three models. However, with the removal of confounding factors, there was no significant difference in this type of adverse reaction in Model 4. In elderly and male patients, the incidence of delirium with gabapentinoids was significantly increased.

PMID

PMID: 39132293

PMCID: PMC11314526

Keywords

Faers
adverse reactions
delirium
gabapentinoids
pharmacovigilance

Page(s)
Issue

Search:
Total Records Found: 6201, showing 100 per page
TitleAuthorsJournalYearKeywords
Undiagnosed delirium is frequent and difficult to predict: Results from a prevalence survey of a tertiary hospital. Lange, P. W. Lamanna, M. Watson, R. Maier, A. B. J Clin Nurs 2019

Undiagnosed delirium
delirium
delirium diagnosis
delirium epidemiology
delirium prevention and control